Skip to main content
All Posts By

Curtis Clarke

Managing Canada’s AI Transformation: A Call for Collective Leadership

By BlogNo Comments

We have the research. We have the funding. Now we need coordinated action across all sectors.

 

Here’s a puzzle that should worry every Canadian leader: we are global champions at AI research but amateurs at AI workforce development.

Canada was first to launch a national AI strategy. Our researchers at the Vector Institute, Mila (Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute), and Amii (Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute) set global standards. We rank alongside South Korea and Japan for AI governance. We have 132 world-class CIFAR (Canadian Institute for Advanced Research) AI Chairs producing breakthrough research.

Yet while AI adoption among Canadian businesses doubled in just one year, nearly half of workers are using AI tools without proper training. Youth unemployment hit 14.6%—the highest since 2010. About 4.2 million Canadian workers face significant job transformation from AI.

The gap between our research excellence and workforce readiness isn’t a policy failure—it’s a leadership opportunity that demands coordinated action across sectors. Each player brings essential capabilities: government’s strategic investment and policy coordination, industry’s real-world demand and co-investment capacity, and post-secondary institutions’ training expertise and regional reach.

Ireland’s Skillnet model shows us what coordinated action looks like: government providing strategic funding and policy frameworks, industry co-investing and defining skill needs, training institutions delivering targeted programs. The result? Over 70,000 workers upskilled annually through 70 industry-led networks.

Canada has a narrow window—perhaps 18 months—to create our own coordinated response before international competitors capture the economic benefits of AI transformation. But only if all three sectors embrace their roles as collective leaders in Canada’s AI transformation.

The Three-Sector Solution Canada Needs

Let’s be clear about what’s at stake. The Conference Board of Canada estimates AI could add $50 billion annually to our GDP if deployed correctly. Workers with AI skills command 25% wage premiums. Companies moving fast on AI achieve productivity growth five times higher than laggards.

But economic potential depends entirely on coordinated action between three essential players—and right now, they’re barely talking to each other.

Government has the policy levers and public investment capacity. Federal AI funding totals $2.4 billion, with substantial resources for infrastructure and workforce development. But government can’t deliver training at scale or identify specific skill gaps fast enough.

Industry has the demand signals and practical context. Companies know exactly which AI skills they need, and which traditional jobs are being transformed. But industry can’t build training infrastructure or serve workers beyond their own organizations.

Post-secondary institutions have the learning expertise and community reach. They can design effective programs and scale them across entire populations. But they can’t move fast enough without clear demand signals and sustained funding partnerships.

None of these sectors can solve Canada’s AI workforce challenge alone. But together, they could create something powerful: a coordinated system that matches Ireland’s Skillnet success but at the speed and scale AI transformation demands.

The question isn’t whether each sector has a role—it’s whether they’ll coordinate their efforts before the window closes.

Proven Models Show Coordinated Action Works

Skillnet Ireland demonstrates what happens when three sectors align their efforts. Government provides strategic funding and policy frameworks. Industry networks co-invest and define specific skill needs. Training institutions deliver targeted programs that match real workforce demands.

The results speak for themselves: over 70,000 workers upskilled annually through 70 industry-led networks, with 89% completion rates and 92% employment outcomes. Each euro of government investment leverages additional private sector funding.

Some Canadian examples are already moving in this direction, proving the concept works here too.

The Vector Institute combines government funding through CIFAR, industry sponsorship from companies like RBC and Shopify, and university expertise from across Ontario. Their coordinated approach has created 289 collaborative projects and 500 new jobs.

Scale AI has partnered with universities to retrain over 3,000 working professionals through industry-informed programs that lead directly to employment.

But these remain isolated successes rather than systematic transformation. We need to scale this coordination model across the country, with the urgency that AI transformation demands.

Every month we delay gives international competitors more time to capture the economic benefits of workforce transformation that should be ours.

Building Canada’s Coordinated Response

Creating a Canadian version of Ireland’s success requires each sector to step up in specific ways—and fast.

Government must lead with strategic coordination. This means moving beyond traditional funding silos to create integrated programs that reward three-way collaboration. Performance-based funding should incentivize industry partnership and workforce outcomes, not just academic metrics. Policy frameworks must enable rapid program development and cross-sector data sharing.

Industry must co-invest in workforce development as competitive strategy. This goes beyond hiring graduates to co-designing programs, providing real-world projects, and sharing expertise with institutions. Companies succeeding at AI understand that building workforce capability is as important as buying technology.

Post-secondary institutions must embrace speed and relevance as core values. This means developing new governance mechanisms for rapid program approval, measuring success by employment outcomes rather than just enrollment, and treating industry partnership as essential mission rather than optional activity.

The coordination challenge is real—these sectors speak different languages, operate on different timelines, and measure success differently. But AI transformation won’t wait for perfect alignment.

Countries like Singapore and Estonia are proving that coordinated action at speed is possible. Their systematic approach to workforce transformation is already attracting international investment and talent that could have come to Canada.

The Competition Is Moving Faster Than We Are

The window for Canadian leadership is closing rapidly. While we debate coordination, other countries are implementing systematic workforce transformation.

Singapore’s $27 billion AI investment includes mandatory collaboration between government, industry, and all research institutions. Their AI Apprenticeship Programme achieves 90%+ graduate placement rates because all three sectors share responsibility for outcomes.

Estonia launched nationwide AI tool access for every student and teacher in months, not years, through coordinated government-industry partnerships.

South Korea’s $69.3 million textbook transformation program required unprecedented coordination between education ministry, technology companies, and universities—completed in under 18 months.

These countries aren’t necessarily smarter than Canada—they’re just acting with greater urgency and better coordination. They understand that AI transformation success depends on systematic collaboration, not isolated excellence.

Canada pioneered a national AI strategy in 2017, giving us a four-year head start. But first-mover advantage disappears quickly if you don’t follow through with coordinated implementation.

We have perhaps 12-18 months before the global competition for AI talent and investment makes Canada’s current advantages irrelevant. The question isn’t whether we can afford to coordinate—it’s whether we can afford not to.

The Time for Coordinated Action Is Now

Canada has everything needed to lead the global transition to an AI economy: world-class research, substantial government investment, innovative companies, and educational institutions with global reputations. What we need now is the coordination to use these assets strategically.

The choice facing us isn’t between change and stability—change is happening whether we coordinate it or not. The choice is between leading global AI transformation through systematic collaboration or watching others capture the economic benefits of research breakthroughs that happened in our labs.

Government leaders: Create funding mechanisms that reward three-way collaboration, not institutional silos. Develop performance metrics that track workforce outcomes across sectors. Move at the speed of technology change, not traditional policy cycles.

Industry leaders: Co-invest in workforce development as competitive strategy, not corporate charity. Share real-time skill requirements with institutions. Commit to multi-year partnerships that allow program development at scale.

Post-secondary leaders: Embrace rapid program development and industry partnership as core mission. Measure success by graduate employment outcomes and regional economic impact. Treat coordination with other sectors as strategic imperative.

All of us: Advocate for the coordinated approach Canada needs. Support leaders who prioritize collaboration over competition. Hold all sectors accountable for the workforce transformation our economy demands.

Ireland’s Skillnet model proves that government, industry, and training institutions can work together to transform workforce capability. Canada needs our own version of this coordination—built for AI transformation and delivered with the urgency this moment demands.

The research advantages that made Canada an AI leader won’t protect us if we can’t translate them into workforce capability. But if we coordinate our efforts now, we can turn our AI research excellence into lasting economic advantage.

Canada’s moment is now. Our three sectors hold the keys together. Let’s use them.

Beyond the Status Quo: A Call for Transformative Educational Partnerships

By BlogNo Comments

Propero Learning Systems’ recent Accelerate2024 conference brought into sharp focus a critical challenge facing our national skills ecosystem: the growing disconnect between post-secondary institutions and industry sectors. A recent survey of 102 national industry associations found a staggering 68% have not collaborated with post-secondary institutions to co-develop curriculum or create meaningful skills pathways. Among those who tried, few reported successful outcomes. The barriers are familiar to many of us: bureaucratic timelines that render technical knowledge obsolete before courses launch, curriculum control mechanisms that limit industry input, and economic models that make collaboration prohibitively expensive. These are not just academic problems—they are strategic challenges that directly impact our ability to develop the talent pipeline our organizations desperately need.

But this is not a moment for frustration; it is an opportunity for strategic redesign. Our most innovative companies have always solved complex problems by creating new frameworks, and now we must apply that same creative thinking to skills development. We need to move beyond traditional engagement models and develop dynamic, real-time collaboration mechanisms that allow for rapid curriculum adaptation, meaningful industry input, and economically viable continuing education programs.

The economic development implications are profound. By creating more responsive skills ecosystems, we can dramatically reduce talent gaps, accelerate workforce readiness, and enhance our national and regional productivity. This requires a willingness to challenge existing structures, invest in new collaborative models, and view educational institutions not as distant entities, but as critical strategic partners in our economic future.

This is not an occasion for resignation, but for innovation. Our academic institutions have always been at the forefront of societal transformation, and now we are called to reimagine our approach to skills development. The traditional model of curriculum development—insulated and slow-moving—is no longer tenable in an economy characterized by rapid technological shifts and evolving workforce needs. We must become more agile, more responsive, and more collaborative.

The challenge before us is to deconstruct the existing paradigms. We need to create flexible, dynamic pathways for industry input, accelerate our curriculum development processes, and develop more economically accessible continuing education models. This requires breaking down internal silos, re-examining our governance structures, and cultivating a mindset of continuous adaptation. Our institutions have the creative genius to lead this transformation—we simply need the collective will to do so.

The time for admiration of these challenges has passed. Now is the moment of action. We invite academic and industry leaders across sectors to join us in pioneering a new approach to skills ecosystem development—one where industry and education are true, responsive partners in preparing our workforce for the future. Together, we can transform our approach, close the skills gap, and position our organizations and our nation for sustained economic success.